Long Answers of T.S. Eliot: “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”

T.S. Eliot: Prufrock Detailed Analysis
Loading Long Notes...
8
Please wait while we generate the answers

The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock
Detailed Exam Answers

Advertisement

1. Prufrock as a Quintessential Modernist Poem

Introduction: T.S. Eliot’s The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock (1915) is widely regarded as the anthem of Modernism. It signaled a radical departure from the Romantic and Victorian traditions that preceded it. While 19th-century poetry focused on nature, beauty, and sublime emotions, Eliot’s poem delves into the sordid, fragmented, and psychological reality of the 20th-century urban experience.

Urban Decay and Realism: One of the most striking modernist elements is the setting. The poem does not take place in a pastoral landscape but in a gritty, decaying city. Eliot presents a world of "restless nights in one-night cheap hotels" and "sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells." The yellow fog that rubs its back upon the window-panes is a personification of industrial pollution. This unflinching portrayal of the ugliness of modern city life is a hallmark of Modernism.

Fragmentation and Allusion: Modernist literature often mirrors the fragmented nature of modern life. Prufrock is not a linear narrative; it is a collage of thoughts, memories, and literary allusions. Eliot references Dante, Shakespeare (Hamlet), the Bible (John the Baptist, Lazarus), and Andrew Marvell. These references are not explained, requiring the reader to piece them together. This technique, known as the "mythic method," places the triviality of Prufrock's life against the grandeur of the past, highlighting the spiritual emptiness of the present.

Psychological Depth: Unlike Victorian poetry which often dealt with social morality, Modernism turns inward. The poem is a "stream of consciousness" exploration of a neurotic mind. Prufrock represents the modern man: over-educated, neurotic, self-conscious, and paralyzed by indecision. His inability to act or communicate reflects the isolation of the individual in the modern world.

2. Character Sketch: J. Alfred Prufrock as an Anti-Hero

The Anti-Hero Archetype: J. Alfred Prufrock is the supreme example of the modern anti-hero. Traditional heroes (like those in epic poetry) are defined by bravery, action, and physical prowess. Prufrock is defined by his fear, inaction, and physical decay. He is a middle-aged man, balding, with thin arms and legs, agonizing over whether he should "dare to eat a peach."

Social Anxiety and Self-Consciousness: Prufrock is trapped in a prison of his own self-consciousness. He is terrified of the "eyes that fix you in a formulated phrase." He feels that society is constantly judging him, pinning him to the wall like an insect in a collection. This fear makes him wear a "face to meet the faces that you meet." He is a man of masks, hiding his true self behind extreme politeness and meticulous dress, yet he knows his efforts are futile.

Intellectual Paralysis: Prufrock is highly intelligent and cultured, but this intelligence is his curse. He over-analyzes every situation until he is incapable of action. He anticipates failure before he even tries. He compares himself to Hamlet but quickly corrects himself, saying he is not the Prince, but merely an "attendant lord"—a background character in his own life. This admission of mediocrity is the tragedy of his character.

Advertisement

3. Themes of Alienation and Lack of Communication

Urban Isolation: The poem paints a bleak picture of urban alienation. Despite being surrounded by people in social settings (tea parties, rooms where women talk of Michelangelo), Prufrock is profoundly alone. The city itself is depicted as a hostile environment with "half-deserted streets" that lead to "overwhelming questions." There is no sense of community; only isolated individuals passing each other in the fog.

Communication Breakdown: The central tragedy of Prufrock is his inability to communicate. He wants to ask an "overwhelming question" (likely a proposal of love or a sharing of his soul), but he is terrified of being misunderstood. He imagines a woman responding, "That is not what I meant at all; That is not it, at all." This fear of emotional rejection silences him. He feels it is impossible to say just what he means.

Emotional Estrangement: Prufrock is estranged not only from others but from his own emotions. He has "measured out his life with coffee spoons," implying a life of triviality and routine rather than passion. The poem ends with the image of mermaids singing. Mermaids symbolize romance, imagination, and freedom. However, Prufrock concludes, "I do not think that they will sing to me." He has accepted his total exclusion from the world of vitality and love.

4. Imagery and Metaphysical Conceits

The Etherized Patient: The poem opens with one of the most famous conceits in English literature: "Let us go then, you and I, / When the evening is spread out against the sky / Like a patient etherized upon a table." This shock tactic connects the romantic evening sky with sickness and surgery. It suggests that the modern world is diseased, numb, and in need of radical intervention.

Zoomorphism (Animal Imagery): Eliot frequently uses animal imagery to degrade the human condition. The yellow fog is described like a cat (rubbing its back, licking its tongue). Prufrock wishes he were a "pair of ragged claws scuttling across the floors of silent seas" (a crab), suggesting a desire to regress to a primitive, mindless state to escape his complex anxieties. He also describes himself as pinned like an insect ("pinned and wriggling on the wall").

Synecdoche and Fragmentation: Eliot uses body parts to represent people, emphasizing the fragmentation of modern life. We do not see whole people; we see "faces," "hands," "arms that are braceleted," and "eyes." This technique reinforces the superficiality of the social world Prufrock inhabits—he sees only the external parts, never the soul.

5. The Interior Monologue: "You and I"

Dramatic Monologue vs. Interior Monologue: While the poem shares features with Browning’s dramatic monologues, it is more accurately an interior monologue. In a dramatic monologue, a speaker addresses a silent listener. In Prufrock, the speaker is addressing himself. The setting is the landscape of Prufrock's mind.

The Identity of "You and I": The opening line "Let us go then, you and I" has been debated by critics. The most accepted interpretation is that "I" is the private, sensitive, feeling Prufrock, while "You" is the public, social mask—the Prufrock who attends tea parties and acts politely. The poem is a dialogue between his desire to act ("I") and his fear of social judgment ("You"). The "You" (fear) constantly suppresses the "I" (desire), leading to paralysis.

6. The Theme of Indecision: "Do I Dare?"

Paralysis of Will: The refrain "Do I dare?" echoes throughout the poem. Prufrock is the embodiment of procrastination. He constantly postpones action: "There will be time, there will be time." He convinces himself that there is plenty of time to change his mind ("Time for you and time for me, / And time yet for a hundred indecisions"). This is a defense mechanism to avoid the risk of living.

The Trivial vs. The Profound: Prufrock’s indecision is pathetic because he agonizes over trivial things (eating a peach, parting his hair) with the same intensity as profound things (the "overwhelming question"). He is afraid to disturb the universe. Ultimately, his indecision leads to a spiritual death. He never asks the question, never connects with the woman, and drowns in the "human voices" of social convention.

Comments