Every Man in His Humour as a comedy of manners. Every Man in His Humour as a comedy of humour.

Discuss Every Man in His Humour as a comedy of manners.

Every Man in His Humour as a comedy of manners. Every Man in His Humour as a comedy of humour.


Ben Jonson introduced a realistic approach to English drama through his famous play Every Man in His Humour. The playwright rejected romantic fantasy and examined contemporary London society directly. He observed the daily vices, superficial habits, and pretentious lifestyles of ordinary citizens closely. A comedy of manners portrays the affectations and artificial social codes of a specific community. Jonson pioneered this dramatic mode by dramatizing middle-class vanity, urban gossip, and daily competition. Therefore, the play represents an early foundation for the English comedy of manners on the Renaissance stage.

The dramatist constructs his characters around distinct social eccentricities and behavioral obsessions called humours. Jonson draws figures who obsess over social prestige, fashion, and superficial elegance. For example, Master Stephen tries hard to imitate gentlemanly habits, but he exposes his rural foolishness constantly. Bobadill boasts about imaginary military victories, yet he shows cowardice in actual confrontations. These figures act purely to impress their wealthy acquaintances and win social approval. Consequently, Jonson uses eccentric characters to satirize the false postures of Renaissance Londoners.

The plot highlights the absurd tensions between genuine gentility and foolish social climbing throughout the scenes. Young country fools travel to the city because they admire fashionable gallants and courtiers. These simple men waste money on expensive garments, tobacco, and fencing lessons to fake high status. Meanwhile, clever urban figures like Wellbred and Young Knowell manipulate these pretenders for their own amusement. The clever characters expose the shallow values of the social climbers through practical jokes. Thus, the comedy derives its humor from the clash between authentic intelligence and empty affectation.

Jonson also mocks the deep irrationality and petty jealousies that divide domestic households in the town. Master Kitely suspects his innocent wife of infidelity without any concrete evidence. He constantly watches his front doors and fears fashionable visitors who frequent his house. Similarly, Old Knowell spies on his adult son's movements due to excessive parental anxiety. These obsessive men worry about household honor and public reputation obsessively. In this manner, the play exposes how petty personal manias ruin domestic peace and social relationships.

The dialogue captures the vivid language, commercial slang, and casual talk of late Elizabethan urban culture. Jonson records the lively conversations of city taverns, markets, private parlors, and public streets with precise realism. Characters use trendy catchphrases, exaggerated oaths, and specialized military jargon to display sophistication. The playwright crafts these witty exchanges to unmask the internal emptiness of his speakers. He replaces romantic poetry with sharp, rhythmic prose that reflects daily life directly. As a result, the play reflects the true linguistic manners and verbal posturing of contemporary city dwellers.

Finally, the resolution restores rational order and corrects social deviations through fair civic authority. Justice Clement gathers all eccentric citizens in his hall to resolve their silly misunderstandings. The sensible judge laughs at harmless fools, rebukes jealous husbands, and pardons harmless youthful love. He reconciles broken families and urges foolish men to abandon their artificial pretenses permanently. Through this balanced ending, Jonson reaffirms the moral and social purpose of Renaissance comedy. Ultimately, the play instructs the audience to prefer common sense, natural behavior, and honest self-knowledge over ridiculous social poses.

Comments